Europe’s prawn obsession ‘devastating’ local communities in Bangladesh


Campaign group calls for a consumer boycott of tropical prawns to stop environmental pollution and human rights abuse in Bangladesh


The popularity of tropical shrimp – often marketed as scampi, giant shrimp, gambas or tiger prawns – is having a devastating impact on local communities in Bangladesh, reveals a new investigation produced in conjunction with the Ecologist’s film partner.

Sales of frozen prawns have soared in recent years, eaten deep-fried, in stir-fries or as sushi.

Global production now exceeds 1.3 million tonnes a year and on the face of it provides much-needed trade for the poor exporting countries, such as Bangladesh.

But a new investigation reveals that far from being of economic benefit to Bangladesh, shrimp farming causes pollution, degradation of agricultural land and loss of mangrove ecosystems protecting coastal communities against storm floods.

These costs far exceed the value of the prawns and scampi produced for western consumers.

The prawn industry is already among the least sustainable fish produced with frozen prawns peeled and shipped around the world at great cost in terms of greenhouse gas emissions.

In Bangladesh fertile crop land has been flooded with waste from expanding prawn farms, while biodiverse-rich Mangrove forests, home to river dolphins and local fish supplies, have been cut down.

Prawn farmers were also found to be using a dangerous pesticide, banned in more than 150 countries around the world because of its toxicity to marine ecosystems and potentially consumers who eat products contaminated with it.

More than half of Bangladesh’s prawns (55 per cent) are exported to the EU before being sold on to supermarkets, wholesalers and restaurants.

Campaign groups have called on consumers, shops and restaurants to stop buying and selling tropical shrimp.

‘While it is easy to blame corrupt officials and weak enforcement…in reality the tropical shrimp industry, with all its multitude of problems, is ultimately driven and fuelled by consumer demand and by the marketing of restaurants, retailers and others,’ says the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, who funded the investigation.

‘Where no shrimp are farmed, mangrove ecosystems and paddy fields can be restored. Abstaining from the prawn on the sushi plate contributes to preserving biodiversity and strengthening the rights of communities to livelihoods and decent lives,’ it says.

The report names Manchester-based Seamark, the UK’s leading importer and processor of shrimps, as one of the companies sourcing from traders linked to destructive practices in Bangladesh.

Seamark declined to comment on the allegations but on its website says it has, ‘always been careful to source its raw materials from environmentally sustainable sources’.

Author: Tom Levitt
Source: The Ecologist
Original: http://goo.gl/RHs37


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              

Leave a Reply / Deixe um comentário

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: