Archive

Daily Archives: 19/10/2011


Indonesia contains some of the world’s richest mineral deposits, located tantalizingly close to the markets of China and India, but a court battle over a $1.8 billion coal mine highlights the risks foreign miners face in the country.

London-listed Churchill Mining Plc has been in dispute with Indonesia’s Nusantara Group for three years over the right to develop the world’s seventh-largest undeveloped coal asset. The case has reached Indonesia’s highest court and could take years more to settle.

The 350-sq-km (135-sq-mile) mine site in East Kutai, a coastal district in East Kalimantan province, is said to contain 2.8 billion tonnes of coal reserves.

“It’s a big medium to low-grade thermal coal deposit,” Churchill Executive Chairman David Quinlivan told Reuters in a telephone interview. “That requires a substantial amount of infrastructure to be able to bring it into production.

“But once in production, it will be very much a long-term project — 50 years or more.”

Nusantara Group originally held six licenses in the disputed area. According to court documents filed by Churchill, these lapsed between March 2006 and March 2007. The East Kutai government declared the area open to other companies and Indonesian firm PT Ridlatama received four mining licenses, Churchill said.

Between November 2007 and February 2008, Churchill bought a 75 percent stake in Ridlatama’s licenses and spent about $40 million on the project. But after Churchill announced in May 2008 that the project could yield substantial coal, things turned messy.

A few weeks later, the East Kutai regional government granted extensions to the Nusantara Group mining licenses that Churchill believed had lapsed.

The undeveloped and potentially highly lucrative coal mine has since become the subject of a series of legal tussles . But after a March 2011 tribunal ruling in Indonesia, Churchill and minority partner Ridlatama no longer own the East Kutai project.

Churchill filed an appeal on September 26 in Indonesia’s Supreme Court. It is unclear how long the court’s verdict will take.

“At least months and it can be years,” said Rozik Soetjipto, an Indonesia mining consultant on supreme court judgments. “About one or two years, maybe longer if something is very exceptional, but generally less than two years.”

Officials at Nusantara were unavailable for comment despite repeated telephone calls and e-mails.

LEGAL TUSSLE

“I’m disappointed more than anything else — that it had to get to this to try and maintain title,” Quinlivan said, adding that Churchill may seek international arbitration. “The legal process doesn’t end in Indonesia.”

According to Churchill, Nusantara Group is controlled by former Indonesian army general Prabowo Subianto.

Prabowo was a former head of the Kopassus special forces and was once married to one of former strongman President Suharto’s daughters. He is the son of a former Indonesian finance minister and data from Indonesia’s anti-graft agency shows he had an estimated personal wealth of about $160 million as of 2009.

The legal tussle between Nusantara and Churchill also highlights the complex bureaucracy of the sprawling country of 17,000 islands.

“If you are going to be on the wrong side of a land acquisition that is in dispute, if it gets blown up in the press, then you will end up with the perception that regulatory risk is getting worse,” said Andreas Bokkenheuser, an analyst at UBS. “But if you look beyond assets in dispute, I actually see the regulatory risk improving in Indonesia.”

The government is drafting a rule that would, by 2014, require miners to carry out minimum processing on minerals before export — part of a mining and coal law introduced in 2009 aimed at making life easier for investors.

Despite these changes, one Indonesia-based analyst estimated there are currently about 100 unresolved disputes involving mine ownership or licenses.

“They are trying to clean up the sector,” said Bokkenheuser. “We’re seeing enforcement of the law, which is positive… There is still a concerted effort to make the mining environment more attractive for foreigners to come in and invest.”

Indonesia’s coal export growth will be fueled in large part by China and India, where power demand is expected to lift coal imports significantly over the next five years. Output will hit 340-354 million tonnes for 2011, industry groups say.

The government has also tabled a new land bill to speed up land acquisition, but it may be not be effective until 2012 and companies still face risks.

“Number one, don’t underestimate the legal due diligence,” said Bokkenheuser, referring to foreign miners looking to invest in Indonesia. “Use a combination of Indonesian and foreign guys to do so because you will need local help on that issue.

“Point number two … you need to make it clear what kind of land you have got — because land is another regulatory issue — we still don’t have a land reform (bill) in Indonesia that empowers the government to buy land.”

For Churchill, the advice may be too late.

“My advice would be, be wary and make sure you’ve done extensive — and I mean extensive — due diligence,” Quinlivan said. “Even though, whilst you may have done all this due diligence, and we certainly believe we had, things can turn around that are very unexpected.

“If there is a loophole there, somebody will use it.” ($1 = 8905 Indonesian Rupiah)

Author: Michael Taylor
Editing: Jason Szep and Raju Gopalakrishnan
Source: REUTERS
Original: http://reut.rs/q2Swcw


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              


“Precisamos de uma revolução energética” pediu o secretário-geral da ONU


Ban Ki-moon: “Necessitamos não somente de uma energia universal, mas que ela seja limpa e sustentável”

Oslo – O secretário-geral da ONU, Ban Ki-moon, que estudou sob a luz de velas quando era jovem, defendeu nesta segunda-feira o acesso universal a uma energia limpa, ainda inacessível para mais da metade da população mundial, segundo um novo estudo.

“Precisamos de uma revolução energética”, declarou Ban durante uma conferência em Oslo. “Necessitamos não somente de uma energia universal, mas que ela seja limpa e sustentável”, disse.

Dos 7 bilhões de pessoas no mundo, mais de 1 bilhão não têm acesso à energia nos dias de hoje, e quase 3 bilhões são obrigadas a utilizar fontes energéticas “sujas” (madeira e carvão) para suas necessidade domésticas, segundo um novo estudo da Agência Internacional de Energia (AIE).

Segundo o secretário-geral da ONU, uma energia limpa em escala mundial é indispensável para responder a “todos os desafios globais”: a pobreza, as mudanças climáticas, a escassez de água, saúde, a crise alimentar e o acesso das mulheres a cargos de responsabilidade.

Organizada pela Noruega e pela AIE, a conferência de Oslo reúne mais de 70 países para discutir o financiamento de uma energia limpa acessível à todos.

A ONU definiu para 2030 três objetivos conectados, lembrou Ban: o acesso de todos aos serviços energéticos modernos, um aumento de 40% da eficácia energética e a duplicação da estrutura de energias renováveis.

Fotografia: Bradley Ambrose / AFP
Fonte: Exame / AFP
Original: http://bit.ly/pHtamf


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              



A former cooling tower stands on the area of the ‘Wunderland Kalkar’ amusement park in Kalkar, Germany.

For your next vacation, how about taking the kids to play at an abandoned nuclear power plant?

This might sound like a quick way to grow an extra set of arms and a few tumors to go with them, but Wunderland Kalkar, a German amusement park built on the grounds of an unused nuclear power plant, is radiation free and features over 40 rides and attractions.

Wunderland Kalkar started life as Schneller Brüter, a planned nuclear power plant built between 1972 and 1991 for approximately 4 billion Euro (US$5.3 billion), reports Gizmag. But political reasons kept the the power plant from ever being fired up.

After the plans for a nuclear plant suffered a meltdown, the land was bought by a Dutch investor, who turned the site into a massive amusement park.

Wunderland Kalkar covers 55 hectares (136 acres). The wiring used to supply it with power could circle the globe twice.

Much of the nuclear plant’s infrastructure was incorporated into the park. The cooling tower, ominous icon of nuclear power, is now a climbing wall, with a giant swing ride in the center (be careful you don’t fallout).


A swing ride sprouts from the center of the cooling tower.

If you get tired from a day of frolicking amongst abandoned cooling towers, there is a 450-room hotel on the site. There’s also restaurants, a bowling alley, tennis courts, miniature golf, and volleyball courts.

Author: Tim Wall
Photography: Corbis
Source: Discovery News
Original: http://bit.ly/oEkkYO


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              



Energia gerada pelo lixo urbano poderia iluminar cerca de 18 milhões de residências

A cada ano, uma quantidade de energia suficiente para abastecer cerca de 18 milhões de residências é jogada no lixo. Literalmente. De acordo com o levantamento realizado pela consultoria Andrade & Canellas, durante este período, o Brasil deixa de gerar entre 3.050 e 3.600 GWh de energia com origem na decomposição do lixo urbano.

A afirmação foi feita com base nas estimativas divulgadas pela Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Limpeza Pública e Resíduos Especiais (Abrelpe), que apontam que em 2010 os lixões e aterros sanitários receberam cerca de 61 milhões de toneladas de resíduos provenientes de cidades de grande e médio porte.

Considerando o potencial do biogás, composto principalmente por metano, cada tonelada poderia gerar entre 50 e 60 KWh de energia elétrica, desde que fossem armazenadas e aproveitadas corretamente.

De acordo com a gerente do núcleo de Energia Térmica e Fontes Alternativas da Andrade & Canellas, Monica Rodrigues de Souza, o desperdício desta forma de energia não é aceitável tanto do ponto de vista estrutural, uma vez que a demanda pelo produto é cada vez maior, quanto pelo risco que representa. “O acúmulo no interior de edificações eventualmente construídas sobre os aterros pode causar explosões (caso do Shopping Center Norte, na Zona Norte de São Paulo)”, aponta Monica.


Gás metano proveniente do lixo polui a atmosfera e pode causar explosões

O metano é mais danoso para a atmosfera que o gás carbônico e pode amplificar o efeito em cerca de 20 vezes se comparado com o CO2. Uma das soluções para reduzir o risco de explosões é instalar um sistema de captação de gás no terreno. Desta forma é possível encontrar dois destinos para o metano: a queima simples, que impede a liberação no ar, e a produção de energia.

O grande entrave para a materialização deste sistema é o alto custo e o retorno em longo prazo. Tendo em vista o potencial do lixo gerado e com o objetivo de mudar o panorama, o governo oferece desconto de 100% na tarifa de transmissão para a energia gerada por usinas desse segmento, no entanto, a falta de políticas públicas para a área e inexistência de linhas de financiamento continuam atrapalhando o desenvolvimento.

“A gestão de resíduos está sendo discutida nas três esferas de poder. Essa é uma ótima oportunidade para regulamentar ações de incentivo à instalação de usinas que permitam aproveitar o potencial de geração de energia a partir do metano. Não podemos nos dar ao luxo de ignorar essa fonte de energia”, encerra Monica, da Andrade & Canellas.

Fotografia: Greentimes
Fonte: EcoDesenvolvimento
Original: http://bit.ly/pSgUWj


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              



In Wayne, N.J., the Passaic River has overflowed its banks four times in six months.

Ten separate billion-dollar weather disasters have hit the United States this year. And in one corner of the ring, with an ice pack on its brow, is the reeling insurance industry.

It may be time for it to re-evaluate the threats and refresh its risk-management strategy.

Erratic and severe weather events, which are expected to increase in frequency as climate change advances, challenge traditional insurance practices that analyze historical patterns to understand the probability of future risk.

“For a long time, this has been very, very effective for most property and casualty insurance companies,” said Paul Kovacs, the founder and executive director of the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, in an interview. “Companies assume that if they look at history, they can get the price right.”

But climate change throws a wrench in the works and is already wreaking havoc on balance sheets and shareholder value, according to Sharlene Leurig of the nonprofit research group Ceres. Ms. Leurig was the lead author of a report released last month that examined how the insurance industry is responding.

Titled “Climate Risk Disclosure by Insurers,” the report found that, despite a broad industry consensus on increased risks from climate change, on average only one in eight insurance companies has a formal climate change policy in place — and that such policies tend to focus narrowly on extreme coastal weather.

The devastation wrought by Hurricane Katrina in 2005 galvanized discussion of climate change among American insurers, Ms. Leurig said in an interview, but the discussion focused on hurricanes rather than the development of broadly defensive policies. “The response was essentially to stop writing business in coastal areas,” she said.

But this year a majority of losses were driven by inland storms. “That makes it a really hard puzzle to solve if you’re an insurer: how do you actually diversify risk if you might get hit by a multibillion-dollar loss just as easily in Kansas as in Florida?” Ms. Leurig said.

Although Mr. Kovacs sees this as a serious industry challenge, he is careful to point out that “climate risk is the real issue, and climate change is a context.” Just as scientists have trouble linking any specific weather disaster to climate change, the precise danger to insurance companies is unknown.

“If the question to an insurer is, ‘How many climate risks led to claims this year?’ then the answer is ‘a lot,’ ” Mr. Kovacs said. “But if you ask how many claims were paid because of climate change, the answer is not yet that many.”

Other concerns, including population shifts to riskier areas and aging infrastructure, are difficult to disentangle from climate change costs.

Nonetheless, 2010 set a new record for natural disasters in the United States, with 247 recorded, according to the Insurance Information Institute. The previous record, set in 2009, was just over 200 natural disasters.

“If we look across the U.S. and rest of world, we look at climate risk, at who’s actually going to pay the bill,” and most will be paid by the insurance industry in concert with government, Mr. Kovacs said. “This is a major public policy issue.”

In addition to presenting the possibility of more and larger payouts because of harsher weather, climate change may also clip one of the industry’s major revenue streams.

The insurance industry collectively manages $23 trillion in global investments, and according to the wealth management firm Mercer Advisors, nearly 10 percent of those assets could be seriously compromised by climate change.

While financial experts are seeking asset allocations that will be more resilient in the face of climate change, questioning the durability of investments in industries that are heavy in carbon dioxide emissions or sensitive to weather, “many insurance groups are not asking these questions at all,” Ms. Leurig said.

The Ceres report notes that liability issues present a third source of threat to the insurance industry. Mr. Kovacs said that a serious academic debate was under way over just how liable insurance companies are in the climate change context.

A 2007 article on the subject outlined some hypotheticals. Imagine that ski resorts in Colorado raised claims against power generators whose emissions contribute to global warming after snow becomes too scarce, or fishermen filed claims against industrialized nations because the warmth of oceans has caused traditional species to die off, for example. Whether insurers would be liable under these circumstances remains legally murky.

Some serious efforts to address such questions are under way within the industry. In 2005 Munich Re, one of the world’s largest insurance companies, formed the Munich Climate Insurance Initiative to enlist governments, nongovernmental organizations, scientists and industry to jointly consider how insurance can help advance solutions to climate change adaptation.

In a first-quarter letter to shareholders this year, Munich Re’s chief executive, Nikolaus von Bomhard, cited a need for “sustainable power generation,” something that the company is supporting through both investment and insurance products, for example.

In the auto insurance sector, some companies are experimenting with pay-as-you-drive policies: customers who drive fewer miles pay lower premiums. In addition to lowering risk exposure — the less you’re on the road, the less likely it is you’ll have an accident — companies are well aware of the environmental benefits.

Similarly, many companies are now offering slightly higher premiums on house insurance that allow homeowners to remodel their homes in accordance with green-building standards.

Most of the work on this problem is being done in the property and casualty insurance areas, Mr. Kovacs said.

“Property is putting a lot of resources into this area,” he added. “Frankly, I’d like to see life and health insurance doing more.”

Although public health specialists are concerned about the effects of climate change on morbidity and mortality statistics, that conversation has hardly penetrated the worlds of life or health insurance.

“Property deals with a year at a time — if they have a bad year, they raise rates,” Mr. Kovacs said. “Life and health deal with the rest of a life. If they don’t get it right at the beginning, then that creates a real problem.”

Author: Dylan Walsh
Photography: Associated Press
Source: The New York Times
Original: http://bit.ly/n0uH5O


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              



A Comissão Europeia diz que as emissões das companhias aéreas duplicaram desde 1990

A regulamentação europeia que força as companhias aéreas a pagar pelas suas emissões de CO2 é mesmo legal, diz um conselheiro do Tribunal de Justiça Europeu, em mais um episódio da batalha entre a UE e a indústria da aviação.

A partir de Janeiro de 2012, todas as companhias aéreas que aterrarem ou descolarem na Europa terão de compensar as emissões do dióxido de carbono (CO2) que emitirem durante os voos através da compra de licenças, conforme prevê um sistema europeu.

Mas estas regras têm sido duramente criticadas, especialmente pelas companhias chinesas e indianas. A indústria da aviação norte-americana, por seu lado, tem tentado bloquear a imposição europeia levando o caso ao Tribunal de Justiça Europeu, alegando que a UE está a exceder a sua autoridade.

Ontem, a opinião da conselheira Juliane Kokott, que não é vinculativa mas pode influenciar o processo no tribunal, rejeitou a tentativa norte-americana. “A legislação europeia não infringe a soberania de outros Estados” e “é compatível com os acordos internacionais relevantes”, comentou, citada pelo site Euroactiv.

A Associação norte-americana de Transportes Aéreos já reagiu às declarações de Kokott. “A tomada de posição anunciada hoje é um passo importante no processo a decorrer no tribunal mas não é vinculativa e não marca o fim do caso”, declarou em comunicado, citado pelo jornal “Washington Post”.

O Tribunal europeu deverá anunciar a sua decisão no início de 2012.

Segundo a Comissão Europeia, as emissões poluentes das companhias aéreas duplicaram desde 1990 e poderão triplicar em 2020, em contraste com outros sectores que têm vindo a poluir cada vez menos.

Fotografia: Tim Wimborne / Reuters
Fonte: Ecosfera – Público
Original: http://bit.ly/oelrh6


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              


In contrast to the squalid conditions faced by many migrant farm workers, employees of salad producer G’s Marketing live in specially-built hostels with a social centre, sports pitches and a bar. Is this the future of industrial horticulture? Andrew Wasley reports


Many of the lettuces eaten in the UK could originate at Barway, HQ of G’s Marketing

You’ve probably never heard of Barway, a small village just outside of Ely in Cambridgeshire, but chances are you’ve eaten a lettuce that was grown there. Barway is home to G’s Marketing, one of the UK’s largest suppliers of salad and vegetables – and one of the largest employers of migrant workers in the horticultural sector.

G’s is part of the Shropshire Group, a major farmers co-operative supplying lettuces, beetroots, celery, radishes, leeks and onions to Britain’s top supermarkets, wholesalers and processors. The group, which has a turnover of more than £240 million, has won accolades for its treatment – and unique facilities – of the thousands of migrant workers it employs each year, mainly from Eastern Europe.

As part of our major investigation into conditions for migrant workers employed in the horticulture sector, the Ecologist was granted unique access to the company’s operations – from touring workers’ accommodation to visiting the harvesting rigs to meeting employees in the packhouse and business department, the nerve centre where the company ensures that constant, round-the-clock orders from retailers and other clients are met.

During peak seasons the group employs as many as 4,500 people – many of them migrants – at cultivation and processing sites in Cambridgeshire, Norfolk, Warwickshire, Gloucestershire and beyond: the company also has operations in the Czech Republic and Spain, the latter ensuring a year-round supply of produce even outside of the UK growing and harvesting season.

The workers housed at the main company hostel at its Barway headquarters are recruited directly from Eastern European countries; G’s says it doesn’t charge workers a fee for joining the company – in contrast with many agencies and gangmaster outfits which do. Some other parts of the business do rely, from time to time, on gangmaster-supplied workers.

The Barway hostel houses up to 600 workers – including Poles, Bulgarians, Lithuanians and others – in dormitory style accommodation or, when at capacity, in a few nearby caravans. Each room contains six beds, a freezer and a fridge (workers cook in a separate dedicated kitchen, or eat in an onsite canteen). Couples can apply for a space in a dedicated two-person room. There’s also a shop, an internet café, a social centre – complete with a well stocked bar – as well as football and basketball pitches, a tennis court and outdoor barbecue area.

The salad village

It isn’t a hotel – the building is closer to a university halls of residence with long corridors, artificial lighting, fire notices and communal bathrooms. Stepping outside, the industrial nature of the site becomes more apparent: almost immediately adjacent to the main accommodation block are the ‘spillover’ caravans, further washrooms and other factory buildings that form part of the giant processing plant that churns out salad and vegetables seven days a week.

But, as the company maintains, people are here to work, to make money to take home to pay for university, to help towards buying a house, to get married. They’re not here to enjoy a holiday. The money most earn at G’s far exceeds what they could expect to earn back home (in one example mentioned, a week’s wages at G’s enabled a worker to pay his college accommodation back home for many months in advance.)

It’s quiet when the Ecologist visits. It’s mid-morning and most of the workers are out in the fields or busy in the packhouse. One or two are resting in the bedrooms and there’s a few ouside reception where small groups are standing or sitting around chatting, smoking or talking on mobile phones. Someone’s hosing down the floor, and some machinery whirs in the background.

The staff at the hostel are genuinely enthusiastic about the facility. Will Goosen, a manager at the Barway hostel, says he believes the company offers foreign workers a good package: they are offered regular work, decent pay, good living conditions and social facilities which far exceed that provided by many other companies. If workers have a problem, be it personal, practical, or relating to work, the hostel staff are on-duty 24 hours a day, he says. Additionally, there’s a dedicated phone service for workers to make any complaints in their own language to an independent third party which operates the scheme.

Workers receive an induction when they arrive at Barway in their native language – something which can, Goosen acknowledges, be challenging – are allocated a room, enrolled at a local medical centre and given assistance with other practical matters such as opening a bank account if needed. The migrants typically come to G’s on contracts of between three and six months – as much as 65 per cent come back – and spend up to six days a week working shifts involving the planting, harvesting or processing of salad and vegetables. Each day, rotas are posted on a giant work allocation sheet so workers know what shift they are doing and in which team.

More you work, more you earn

Most workers are paid on a piecework system with payment based on results – the more work completed the more money a worker earns – although some jobs are based on an hourly rate. G’s says all its payment rates are in accordance with the current national minimum wage (£5.93 per hour) or the agricultural wages order (£5.95 per hour), which is soon to be scrapped with the winding down of the Agricultural Wages Board.

Typically, according to the company, workers earn around £250 per week; a figure that can rise for experienced – and fast – employees. All workers are expected to carry out overtime, orders permitting, and all pay tax and national insurance as they are fully registered and legally working in the UK. £32 is deducted each week for accommodation.

Workers at Barway are not part of a union, although the company operates an Employers Consultative Committee (ECC) system, where elected representatives can make representations to management on any aspect of their employment. Although there is not much free time – during peak seasons (April until October) workers are in the fields or factories six days a week – the company lays on excursions and organises social activities. The Barway plant has a yearly ‘open farm Sunday’ when members of the public are invited to the facility to meet workers and see the operation for themselves.

According to Sharon Cross, group HR operations manager, the company has steadily built up a good relationship with the local community, and gone to great lengths to ensure people are aware that workers inject money back into the wider community by using local shops, pubs and other services. This contrasts with reports from elsewhere across East Anglia, Lincolnshire and beyond which have consistently described relations between migrant workers and locals as being marred by hostility.

G’s unique approach – building dedicated accommodation and supplying workers with just about every facility they need in one location – has undoubtedly reduced the risk of problems. If the thousands of migrant workers G’s employs each year tried to find rental accommodation in local towns or villages there’d be massive concerns over overcrowding and conditions, as well as a knock-on effect for locals trying to find somewhere to live. Additionally, such circumstances could attract the attention of unscrupulous characters looking to cash in on easily exploitable workers.

Several locals in Ely the Ecologist spoke to weren’t even aware of the G’s operation; two others said they’d heard of the company but had only been told ‘good things’; a third person knew all about it – her husband worked at Barway. There are also those who hold the common opinion that foreign workers are taking jobs that Brits could do, but, as has been repeatedly demonstrated, most British workers don’t want to do this work because of its physically demanding nature.

G’s are upfront from the outset about the work they offer: ‘We work outdoors in all weathers and the jobs tend to be physically demanding…’ the company’s website says. ‘The work is mostly manual planting, picking and harvesting of salad and vegetables, which involves a considerable amount of bending, walking and lifting.’

Relentless pace

The Ecologist visited workers harvesting both lettuces and celery out in the fields beyond Barway. The work is undeniably tough, with teams of pickers shuffling slowly in the mud alongside the giant ‘rigs’ that double as mobile factory processing units. The celery teams, consisting of between 13 and 16 workers, continuously bend, grab a stick, cut the bottom, cut the top, chop off the leaves. Then it’s onto the conveyor belt which carries the vegetables into the processing area above. Here, the celery are sized, washed and wrapped – all virtually automatically (small and overweight units are separated for later use in vegetable snack pots assembled in the packhouse).

It’s relentless, dirty, noisy work. This is Europe’s biggest celery grower. Ysvetomir Tsenkov, celery harvest manager, explains how as many as 30 million sticks of celery are cut and processed here each year between June and November. As many as 200 workers can be out on the rigs harvesting at any one time, each rig completing an eight hour shift that will see thousands and thousands of sticks picked. During peak seasons it can be a 24 hour operation – the company has giant spotlights which can be brought in to illuminate the fields so workers can harvest through the night.

One worker looks up from his job in the processing area and shrugs, saying if he didn’t like the work he wouldn’t stay. He’s living at Barway and says there’s lots of people and much socialising. His girlfriend is also here. He’s studying economics back home but needs the money that this work provides. Another man – who says where he’s from but it is impossible to hear – appears less enthusiastic, saying that although the money is good, the work is hard and he’s looking forward to returning home.

On the rigs harvesting little gem lettuces, the pace is just as intense: today there’s five rigs with crews of 21 each working the fields; 10 to 12 people cutting down below, the others on top. As many as 70,000 little gem lettuces being harvested in one day is common – there was one occasion when staff say 132,000 were picked in a single day. Upstairs, in the noisy rig bay area, the lettuces come off the conveyor belt thick and fast, straight into plastic wrapping. These are going to Tesco, the labels indicate. They’ll leave Barway tonight, a worker explains, go to the depot and then be on their way to the supermarket shelf soon after.

We leave the lettuce gang to it, swapping the exposed rig for a comfy 4×4. It’s dry outside today, but I wonder what things are like when it’s raining. A canopy is used, says Will Goosen, but the ground, and just about everything else, including the workers, presumably still get soaked.

Intensive supply chains

Back in the packhouse, the Ecologist accompanies a shift of workers about to start processing and boxing up some of the produce coming in from the surrounding fields. Biosecurity is tight; overalls and hairnets are given out and hands washed while bags and other items have to be left in the locker room. Inside, teams of operatives are busy on production lines laid out in front of a wall containing data relating to the days’ orders – how many of each product, in what format and at what price. This is where the scale of the G’s operation really becomes clear. Information is processed through to here from a team of product managers and logistics experts situated elsewhere in the building. A supervisor oversees processing and the dispatching of large consignments out to waiting trucks.

Charlie Kisby, product manager, based in the company’s business centre, later talks me through the complex process of ensuring the company’s clients – including all of the major supermarkets – receive what they want, when they want it. At 8am an order may come in, for say 10,000 or 20,000 lettuces – by 6 or 7pm that consignment needs to have been ordered, harvested, processed, boxed up and be on its way to the depot. This is a typical time span but it can vary. G’s gets paid on what it delivers. It’s very rare for an order to be ‘dropped’ and not delivered.

There’s night shifts organised to cover extra large orders, or a shortfall from daytime harvesting – if not enough workers are booked in, loudspeaker messages are broadcast at the hostel asking for extra hands who want to do overtime – alongside a 24 hour packhouse operation if needed. Nothing is left to chance and orders are predicted; the company has a dedicated computer system to enable it to accurately forecast sales, which takes into account myriad factors including historical order data, weather and supermarket promotions. Nothing can entirely equip the operation for some unexpected events however, such as when the BBC weather forecast predicts it is going to be hot and sunny and people get planning their barbeques. When this happens, orders for lettuce can go through the roof.

All this is explains in part why the industrial horticulture sector – in common with most other types of agriculture – is increasingly dominated by fewer, and larger, more integrated operators. The intense, last minute nature of modern supply chains means smaller, less well equipped outfits simply couldn’t cope with the demands of the large retailers. The G’s operation is the salad equivalent of the ‘mega farms’ currently being touted to supply the UK’s appetite for cheap pork or milk.

Kisby acknowledges that there’s not many small players any more. Despite this, he believes there’s still only two key resources needed; soil type, and the people who make up the business. Without people, the business simply couldn’t function, he says. There’s no replacement for the human eye and judgement. He says that if the company didn’t look after its workers, its labour source would dry up: from an ethical point of view, it’s the right thing to do, he argues.

The cheap gang labour of the past is not going to do.

Author: Andrew Wasley
Source: The Ecologist
Original: http://bit.ly/prPYu8


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS:
              


Até o dia 15, os peritos irão acompanhar e orientar os trabalhos referentes à contaminação radioativa na Usina Nuclear de Fukushima


Os peritos têm experiência em atividades de descontaminação em áreas atingidas pelo acidente nuclear de Chernobyl em 1986

Brasília – A Agência Internacional de Energia Atômica (Aiea) enviou uma equipe de especialistas ao Japão. Até o dia 15, os peritos irão acompanhar e orientar os trabalhos referentes à contaminação radioativa na Usina Nuclear de Fukushima Daiichi, no Nordeste do país. Em consequência do terremoto seguido do tsunami, de 11 de março deste ano, houve explosões e vazamentos radioativos na região.

Ontem (6) 12 especialistas da Aiea deixaram Viena, na Áustria, em direção ao Japão. Os peritos têm experiência em atividades de descontaminação em áreas atingidas pelo acidente nuclear de Chernobyl em 1986 – a usina localizada na Ucrânia foi atingida por uma explosão causada em um dos reatores. Até hoje a área em torno da usina é considerada de alto risco.

A equipe de peritos será chefia por Juan Carlos Lentijo. Segundo ele, o esforço feito pela equipe é para que o Japão consiga encontrar meios de conter os riscos gerados pela radiação. Lentijo disse a equipe vai apresentar propostas para compartilhar com os especialistas do Japão. A ideia é sugerir medidas de descontaminação a autoridades japonesas e aconselhar moradores.

Várias cidades ao redor de Fukushima foram esvaziadas pelas autoridades japonesas na tentativa de conter as ameaças causadas pelos acidentes radioativos. Crianças e idosos são monitorados constantemente. Os vegetais e a carne produzidos na região foram proibidos para o consumo e a venda. Com informações da emissora estatal de televisão do Japão, a NHK.

Autor: Renata Giraldi
Fotografia: AFP
Fonte: Exame / Agência Brasil
Original: http://bit.ly/oKz3lI


FOLLOW US / SIGA-NOS: